How to Navigate Medical Malpractice Cases

Story by Joel Berly
October 1, 2025

Medical malpractice cases are among the most challenging legal battles a plaintiff can face. With success rates for plaintiffs hovering between 10% and 20% in some states, the journey to justice is fraught with high costs, complex procedures, and significant burdens of proof. Yet, understanding the intricacies of these cases can empower victims – and their families – to navigate the system more effectively.

In this article, we’ll unpack the complexities of medical malpractice litigation, examine the barriers plaintiffs often face, and explore actionable steps to build a strong case. While medical malpractice laws vary by state, the insights provided here are vital for anyone considering legal action against a healthcare provider.

Understanding Medical Malpractice: The Basics

At its core, medical malpractice occurs when a healthcare provider breaches the standard of care, resulting in harm to a patient. But what does this really mean?

The standard of care refers to the minimally acceptable professional standards that a competent healthcare provider should follow in similar circumstances. Examples of breaches include:

• Misdiagnosing a condition (e.g., failing to identify cancer)
• Administering the wrong medication or dosage
• Failing to order necessary tests or procedures
• Neglecting symptoms that indicate a serious condition

It’s crucial to note, however, that not every poor outcome qualifies as malpractice. For instance:

• Known risks or rare side effects of a procedure, even if severe, do not necessarily indicate malpractice.
• A bad outcome does not automatically mean a provider breached the standard of care.

Plaintiffs must prove two critical elements to succeed: breach of the standard of care and causation. Without clear evidence linking a provider’s actions to the harm experienced, the case is unlikely to succeed.

Barriers to Entry: Why Medical Malpractice Cases Are So Difficult

One of the reasons medical malpractice cases are so challenging is the number of hurdles plaintiffs face before even filing a lawsuit. These include:

1. The Cost of Expert Opinions

Proving malpractice isn’t as simple as sharing your experience. Plaintiffs must secure expert testimony from a qualified medical professional who supports their claim. This begins with obtaining a certificate of merit (or certificate of good faith in some states), a document stating that an expert has reviewed the case and believes it meets the threshold for malpractice.

This step can cost thousands of dollars – $1,500 to $3,000 for the expert review alone – and plaintiffs must bear these costs upfront. For cases with relatively low damages, this financial burden can make pursuing legal action impossible.

2. Complexity of Medical Evidence

Unlike straightforward car accident cases where liability may be apparent (e.g., running a red light), medical malpractice cases often involve highly technical evidence. A jury must understand complex medical data, such as blood work results or imaging studies, to determine whether negligence occurred. This often requires multiple expert witnesses, further escalating costs.

3. Causation Challenges

Proving causation can be particularly tricky. For example:

• In a cancer misdiagnosis case, plaintiffs must demonstrate that an earlier diagnosis would have improved the outcome. This often requires detailed timelines and expert analysis.
• In wrongful death cases, plaintiffs may need to prove the deceased had a greater than 50% survival rate if treated properly – a high bar to clear.

4. State-Specific Legal Obstacles

Each state has unique regulations governing medical malpractice cases. For instance:

• Some require pre-suit notice, a formal process of alerting the defendant before filing a lawsuit. Missing even a minor technicality in this process can result in dismissal.
• In states like Tennessee, pre-suit settlement discussions are almost nonexistent, unlike car accident cases where negotiations often occur before litigation.

5. Bias Toward Healthcare Providers

There’s a societal predisposition to trust doctors and healthcare professionals, especially post-pandemic. Jurors are often sympathetic to providers, viewing them as individuals doing their best in challenging circumstances. This bias can make it hard for plaintiffs to win at trial.

The Long Road to Resolution

Medical malpractice lawsuits are notoriously lengthy, often taking two to three years to resolve. The process typically includes:

• Filing the lawsuit after meeting pre-suit requirements.
• Discovery, where both sides gather evidence through depositions, expert reports, and medical records.
• Potential settlement negotiations or trials, though most cases are dismissed or settled before trial.

Unfortunately, the odds of a plaintiff winning at trial are slim – only 10% to 20% succeed. However, when plaintiffs do win, verdicts often involve significant compensation to reflect the severity of the harm caused.

How to Get Started: Practical Steps for Plaintiffs

If you think you have a medical malpractice case, preparation is key. Here are actionable steps to take:

1. Obtain Your Medical Records

Start by requesting your complete medical records from all relevant providers. These documents are crucial for building your case. Providers are required by law to give you access, and it’s often cheaper for patients to request their records directly rather than through an attorney.

2. Consult a Qualified Attorney

Medical malpractice litigation is highly specialized. Working with an experienced attorney familiar with state-specific requirements can make a significant difference. They will analyze your records and consult medical experts to assess the strength of your case.

3. Understand the Costs Involved

Be prepared for the financial commitment required to pursue a malpractice case. Discuss potential expenses, such as expert reviews and filing fees, with your attorney before proceeding.

Key Takeaways

• Medical malpractice cases are challenging to win, with success rates for plaintiffs as low as 10% in some states.
• Proving malpractice requires expert testimony, which is costly and necessary to establish a breach of the standard of care and causation.
• Pre-suit requirements like certificates of merit and pre-suit notice create additional barriers for plaintiffs.
• Jury bias toward healthcare providers and the complexity of medical evidence often work in favor of the defense.
• To begin a case, obtain your medical records and consult an experienced attorney who understands the nuances of medical malpractice litigation.

Conclusion

Medical malpractice cases demand patience, resources, and expert guidance. While the barriers to entry can feel overwhelming, understanding the challenges and taking proactive steps can help plaintiffs build stronger cases. Whether you’re seeking justice for a loved one or grappling with the aftermath of a medical error, remember that the journey may be long – but achieving accountability for negligence is a cause worth pursuing.

Source: "How a Medical Malpractice Case Really Works" – DRS Law Personal Injury Lawyers, YouTube, Aug 6, 2025 – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LMXGsPu6eUQ

Use: Embedded for reference. Brief quotes used for commentary/review.

Related Blog Posts

• Medical Malpractice: Proving Negligence Guide
• South Carolina Personal Injury Trial Process
• Guide To Medical Malpractice Lawyers In SC
• How hard is it to win a personal injury lawsuit?

Categories: Uncategorized