Story by Joel Berly
November 10, 2025
When it comes to medical errors, misdiagnosis and delayed diagnosis are two of the most common – and harmful – types. Here’s the difference:
Both errors can have severe consequences, including worsened health, emotional distress, and financial strain. They also form the basis for many medical malpractice claims, especially in states like South Carolina, where specific legal standards must be met to pursue compensation.
| Aspect | Misdiagnosis | Delayed Diagnosis |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Wrong condition identified | Correct diagnosis made too late |
| Common Causes | Misread tests, cognitive bias | Ignored symptoms, delayed follow-up |
| Patient Impact | Harmful/unnecessary treatments | Disease progression due to delay |
| Legal Focus | Harm from incorrect treatment | Harm from delayed intervention |
Both types of errors require proof of negligence and harm to file a malpractice claim. Navigating these cases involves understanding the legal standards, gathering evidence, and securing expert testimony.
If you believe you’ve been harmed by a diagnostic error, it’s essential to act quickly, as time limits for filing claims vary. For South Carolina residents, consulting an experienced attorney is critical to protecting your rights and seeking compensation.
Misdiagnosis happens when a healthcare provider incorrectly identifies a medical condition, leading to the wrong diagnosis and, often, inappropriate treatment. This can include both false positives (diagnosing a condition that isn’t present) and missed diagnoses (failing to identify an existing condition).
Take, for instance, a patient in South Carolina experiencing neurological symptoms. They might be told they have a migraine when, in reality, they’re having a stroke – missing out on potentially life-saving intervention. Another example is when a malignant tumor is mistaken for a benign one, delaying vital cancer treatment. These errors can trigger a cascade of complications, as explored further in the discussion of common causes.
There are several reasons misdiagnoses occur. Sometimes, healthcare providers skip necessary tests or misread results, especially when test outcomes are unclear. Cognitive biases, like anchoring bias – where a provider sticks to an initial diagnosis even when new evidence suggests otherwise – can also play a role. Other factors include failing to thoroughly review a patient’s medical history or poor communication among healthcare teams, both of which can lead to critical details being overlooked. These errors don’t just disrupt treatment plans – they can have serious, even life-threatening, consequences for patients.
The effects of misdiagnosis can be devastating. Patients may receive treatments that are not only unnecessary but also harmful, while their actual condition remains untreated and worsens. For example, misdiagnosing cancer as a benign condition can result in patients missing crucial treatment windows. Similarly, a heart attack misdiagnosed as a less severe issue can delay life-saving care.
The damage isn’t just physical. Misdiagnosis often causes emotional turmoil for patients and their families, shaking their trust in the healthcare system. Anxiety, depression, and a sense of helplessness are common. On top of that, the financial burden can be overwhelming. Patients may face mounting medical bills and lose income due to prolonged illness. Studies highlight that conditions like cancer, infections, and vascular events (such as strokes and heart attacks) are among the most frequently misdiagnosed, underscoring the widespread nature of this issue.
Delayed diagnosis happens when a healthcare provider identifies the correct medical condition, but only after an avoidable delay. Unlike misdiagnosis, where the wrong condition is diagnosed, delayed diagnosis means the right condition is found too late – often causing patients to miss critical treatment opportunities.
Take this example: A Charleston patient shows early stroke symptoms, like sudden weakness and confusion, but is sent home without a brain scan. Days later, severe complications bring the patient back to the hospital, where the stroke is finally diagnosed – too late for life-saving treatment.
Another instance might involve a patient with abnormal cancer test results. If follow-up care is delayed, the cancer could progress to a stage where fewer treatment options are available, and survival rates drop. These scenarios highlight how lapses in procedures can delay proper care.
There are several reasons why delayed diagnosis happens in healthcare. One major issue is the failure to order the right diagnostic tests. Providers might skip imaging, blood work, or other specialized tests, even when symptoms clearly call for further investigation. Another common problem is misinterpreting test results, especially when subtle warning signs are missed or the provider isn’t experienced with a particular condition.
Inadequate follow-up on abnormal test results is another factor. Sometimes, concerning findings aren’t acted on quickly – whether because of communication breakdowns between healthcare staff or the overwhelming pace of busy clinics. Additionally, understaffing and overworked teams can lead to delays when less urgent tests are pushed back.
The consequences of delayed diagnosis can be severe and life-altering. As conditions worsen during the delay, patients may face more aggressive treatments, reduced chances of recovery, or permanent complications that could have been avoided with timely care.
For example, cancer patients often bear the brunt of diagnostic delays. A tumor that could have been treated effectively when localized may grow to an advanced stage, leaving fewer treatment options and lowering survival rates.
Delays in addressing emergencies like heart attacks or strokes can lead to permanent damage. Patients may suffer from paralysis, speech impairments, or cognitive issues – all of which might have been prevented with faster intervention.
The emotional toll is also profound. Patients may lose trust in their healthcare providers, while families often experience heightened stress, anxiety, and even depression.
On top of physical and emotional harm, delayed diagnosis can bring financial strain. Conditions that could have been treated early and inexpensively may escalate, requiring costly hospital stays, intensive treatments, or long-term care. Patients may also face lost income and mounting medical bills, adding to their burden. These impacts not only harm patients but also frequently lead to medical malpractice claims in South Carolina.
In South Carolina, patients who suffer harm due to a misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis must meet specific legal criteria to file a malpractice claim. Understanding these legal requirements is essential for anyone considering action against a healthcare provider for failing to diagnose a condition correctly. These standards form the basis for evaluating how each diagnostic error aligns with the state’s malpractice laws.
When it comes to diagnostic errors, South Carolina law outlines four key elements that injured patients must prove: duty of care, breach of duty, causation, and damages. Each of these elements must be backed by clear and convincing evidence:
Time is a critical factor in filing a medical malpractice claim in South Carolina. Generally, patients have three years from the date of the alleged malpractice or from when the injury was discovered – or reasonably should have been discovered – to file a claim. However, there is an absolute cutoff of six years from the date the malpractice occurred, regardless of when it was discovered.
In cases involving delayed diagnoses, the clock often starts when the patient becomes aware that the delay caused harm. Special rules apply to vulnerable individuals, such as minors or those who are mentally incapacitated. For instance, the statute of limitations may be paused until a minor turns 18 or until an incapacitated person regains their mental capacity.
Expert testimony is a cornerstone of proving breach and causation in medical malpractice cases involving diagnostic errors. South Carolina law requires that the expert witness be qualified in the same medical field as the healthcare provider being accused. For example, in a case involving a delayed cancer diagnosis, the expert would typically be a board-certified oncologist.
The expert’s role is to explain the standard of care, detail how the provider’s actions deviated from that standard, and show how the breach directly caused harm to the patient. The strength and clarity of this testimony can significantly influence the outcome of a case, making it a critical component of any malpractice claim.
Now that we’ve defined misdiagnosis and delayed diagnosis, let’s explore what sets them apart. Misdiagnosis happens when a condition is incorrectly identified, leading to the wrong treatment. Delayed diagnosis, on the other hand, refers to a correct diagnosis being made – but only after an avoidable delay, which can worsen the patient’s condition.
The reasons behind these errors differ significantly. Misdiagnosis often stems from errors like misreading test results, overlooking a patient’s medical history, cognitive biases, or failing to order the right tests. Delayed diagnosis, however, is more likely to result from not acting on abnormal findings, ignoring symptoms, or failing to address early warning signs promptly. These distinct causes directly influence the outcomes for patients.
The consequences for patients also vary. Misdiagnosis can lead to unnecessary or even harmful treatments, while the real condition goes untreated. For delayed diagnosis, the problem lies in the postponement of proper care, allowing the disease to progress and reducing the chances of effective intervention.
Both misdiagnosis and delayed diagnosis require proof of malpractice, but the legal arguments differ. For misdiagnosis claims, the focus is on showing that the wrong diagnosis led to inappropriate treatment. In delayed diagnosis cases, the emphasis is on proving that the delay in identifying the condition caused additional harm.
Evidence requirements also differ. Misdiagnosis cases rely on medical records showing the incorrect diagnosis and resulting treatment errors. Delayed diagnosis cases need documentation of the timeline, missed opportunities for earlier intervention, and how the delay worsened the patient’s condition.
Expert testimony plays a critical role in both scenarios but with distinct approaches. In misdiagnosis claims, experts explain how a competent provider should have arrived at the correct diagnosis. For delayed diagnosis, they must demonstrate that an earlier diagnosis was possible and that the delay directly caused harm.
| Aspect | Misdiagnosis | Delayed Diagnosis |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Wrong condition identified | Correct diagnosis made too late |
| Common Causes | Misread test results, cognitive biases | Ignored symptoms, failure to act on findings |
| Patient Outcomes | Harmful or unnecessary treatment | Disease progression due to delayed care |
| Legal Focus | Harm from incorrect treatment | Harm from delayed intervention |
| Evidence Required | Incorrect diagnosis and inappropriate care | Timeline and missed opportunities |
| Expert Testimony | How correct diagnosis should’ve been made | How timely diagnosis could’ve prevented harm |
The type of harm suffered often dictates the compensation sought. In misdiagnosis cases, damages typically cover harm caused by unnecessary or harmful treatments. For delayed diagnosis, the focus shifts to the progression of the disease due to the delay. In both scenarios, claimants may pursue economic damages (like medical bills and lost income) and non-economic damages (such as pain and suffering).
Understanding these differences is essential for patients and their legal teams when building a case and collecting evidence. Diagnostic errors make up about 26% of medical malpractice claims in South Carolina.
In South Carolina, victims of misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis have the right to seek compensation for both financial losses and non-economic harm caused by medical errors.
Economic damages refer to tangible financial losses, such as medical bills, lost wages, and the costs of future care. The exact costs depend on whether the case involves misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis.
In cases of misdiagnosis, economic damages often include the costs of unnecessary treatments or surgeries that were performed based on an incorrect diagnosis. For instance, if you were wrongly diagnosed with a non-threatening condition instead of cancer, you might have undergone inappropriate procedures while the actual condition remained untreated. These unnecessary treatments and the subsequent corrective care both fall under economic damages.
For delayed diagnosis cases, economic damages focus on the additional expenses that arise due to the progression of the untreated condition. When a diagnosis is delayed, the illness may worsen, requiring more aggressive or extensive medical interventions than would have been needed with timely care. These increased medical costs, combined with extended periods of missed work, form the basis of economic claims.
Non-economic damages address the emotional and intangible effects of diagnostic errors, such as pain and suffering, emotional distress, loss of companionship, and a diminished quality of life. South Carolina law acknowledges that the harm caused by medical errors goes beyond financial costs.
The nature of non-economic damages differs depending on the type of diagnostic error. In misdiagnosis cases, you may endure trauma from undergoing incorrect treatments, anxiety from not knowing your actual condition, or physical pain from unnecessary procedures. For delayed diagnosis cases, the impact often includes prolonged suffering, increased illness severity, or even reduced life expectancy due to the delay in treatment.
South Carolina places limits on non-economic damages in medical malpractice cases. Currently, these caps are set at $350,000 per defendant and $1.05 million total across all defendants in most cases. These limits apply whether the claim involves misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis.
In rare cases of extreme misconduct, courts may also award punitive damages.
Punitive damages are not designed to compensate victims but to punish healthcare providers for willful or grossly negligent behavior. These damages are awarded only in exceptional situations where the provider’s conduct demonstrates reckless disregard for patient safety.
In diagnostic error cases, punitive damages might apply if a healthcare provider deliberately ignored critical test results or falsified medical records, leading to misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis. The behavior must go beyond ordinary negligence to qualify as willful or wanton misconduct.
South Carolina generally limits punitive damages to either three times the amount of compensatory damages or $500,000, whichever is greater. However, these awards are uncommon in medical malpractice cases, as most diagnostic errors stem from negligence rather than intentional wrongdoing.
The process of calculating damages varies. Economic damages are based on concrete evidence, such as medical bills, pay stubs, and projections for future expenses. Non-economic damages, on the other hand, are more subjective and are often determined by a jury. Testimony from you, your family, and medical experts about the pain, suffering, and impact on your life plays a critical role in these assessments.
Under South Carolina malpractice law, expert testimony is essential for determining damages. Medical experts help establish how the provider’s error caused specific injuries and provide estimates for future medical needs, lost earning potential, and the overall effect on your quality of life. This testimony is crucial for both misdiagnosis and delayed diagnosis claims.
South Carolina’s specific legal requirements add another layer of complexity to diagnostic error claims. The state’s strict procedural rules can heavily influence the outcome of cases involving misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis, making it crucial to navigate these nuances carefully.
In South Carolina, filing a diagnostic error lawsuit requires a Notice of Intent to File Suit accompanied by an affidavit from a qualified medical expert. Skipping this critical step could result in your claim being dismissed outright.
Additionally, the state enforces strict qualifications for expert witnesses. Your medical expert must not only specialize in the relevant field but also base their opinions on medical practices recognized within South Carolina. If an attorney selects an expert who doesn’t meet these criteria, it could seriously undermine your case.
Timing is another key factor. South Carolina’s statute of limitations for medical malpractice claims is intricate, and missing the filing deadline could mean losing your right to pursue compensation. Local attorneys are well-versed in these time-sensitive requirements, ensuring your claim is filed correctly and on time.
South Carolina law also imposes caps on non-economic damages in medical malpractice cases, though the specific limits depend on the details of your case. Understanding these caps and structuring your claim to maximize potential recovery requires a deep familiarity with state laws.
Lastly, local attorneys often have insights into diagnostic error trends that may not be apparent to lawyers from outside the state. This knowledge can be invaluable in building a strong case.
For these reasons, working with experienced South Carolina legal counsel is critical to successfully navigating the complexities of a diagnostic error claim.
When it comes to handling medical malpractice claims in South Carolina, Berly Rouse Attorneys bring decades of trial experience and a deep understanding of the state’s legal landscape.
"We bring decades of trial experience and a relentless commitment to justice for the injured." – Berly Rouse Attorneys
Their firm operates across South Carolina, serving cities such as Charleston, Mount Pleasant, Summerville, North Charleston, Bluffton, Florence, Greenville, Columbia, Myrtle Beach, Pawleys Island, Hilton Head, Georgetown, and Beaufort. This statewide reach ensures they are familiar with regional variations in medical practices and court procedures that could impact your case.
Berly Rouse Attorneys work on a contingency basis, meaning no upfront fees. Their approach includes thorough investigations, partnerships with qualified medical experts, and meticulous preparation for both settlement discussions and trial.
"At Berly Rouse, you can expect qualified, compassionate legal representation to help you get the compensation you deserve." – Berly Rouse Attorneys
With their comprehensive knowledge of South Carolina’s legal requirements, Berly Rouse Attorneys are well-equipped to handle your diagnostic error claim with care and precision.
Misdiagnosis occurs when a medical condition is incorrectly identified, while delayed diagnosis happens when the correct condition is recognized too late, allowing the illness to progress unnecessarily.
Both scenarios can lead to severe consequences: unnecessary treatments, worsening health outcomes, inflated medical expenses, and significant emotional distress. According to Johns Hopkins Hospital, one in every 71 cancer cases is misdiagnosed, and one in five is misclassified – a sobering reminder of the risks these errors pose to patient safety.
These outcomes highlight the importance of taking precise legal action. South Carolina’s legal framework for addressing diagnostic errors requires navigating intricate medical malpractice laws. Successfully pursuing a case for misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis involves gathering robust evidence, securing expert medical testimony, and understanding the state’s specific legal standards and procedural requirements. The distinction between these errors significantly impacts legal strategies, the type of evidence needed, and the potential damages that can be recovered.
Given these complexities, patients in South Carolina who suspect harm from diagnostic errors should seek skilled legal representation. Medical malpractice cases are challenging, with strict laws and tight deadlines, making professional guidance essential to protect your rights and pursue fair compensation.
If you or someone you care about has been affected by misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis, reach out to the dedicated team at Berly Rouse Attorneys to safeguard your rights and explore your options for compensation.
Identifying a misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis can feel overwhelming, but there are some key indicators to keep in mind. For instance, a misdiagnosis might be at play if your symptoms don’t improve – or even get worse – despite following the prescribed treatment. Similarly, conflicting opinions from different doctors could also point to a potential misdiagnosis. On the other hand, a delayed diagnosis might be suspected if there was a long gap between when you first sought medical care and when your condition was correctly identified, especially if this delay negatively affected your recovery or overall prognosis.
If you think you’ve faced either of these situations, it’s important to seek advice from a qualified attorney who can guide you through your options. In South Carolina, firms like Berly Rouse Attorneys are known for providing compassionate and knowledgeable legal support to help clients fight for justice and fair compensation.
To succeed in a medical malpractice case involving misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis in South Carolina, you’ll need to demonstrate four key elements:
Every case is different, so gathering detailed records and expert opinions is essential. An experienced attorney can help you navigate the process and ensure your rights are protected.
If you think a diagnostic error has caused you harm, taking quick action is essential. Begin by getting a second medical opinion to confirm the problem and collect all relevant medical records. Consulting with an experienced attorney – like Berly Rouse Attorneys in Charleston, SC – can help you explore your legal options and safeguard your rights.
Time is of the essence, as there are strict deadlines for filing claims. Acting promptly not only allows for a thorough review of your case but also improves the likelihood of a positive resolution.
If you need experienced legal representation in Charleston, South Carolina, contact Berly Rouse. Our team is ready to help you achieve the best possible outcome. Visit our offices or call today to schedule a consultation to discuss your case.
At Berly Rouse, we’re proud to be a leading law firm in Charleston, SC, committed to serving our community with integrity, dedication, and legal excellence. Let us put our experience to work for you.
The Law Isn't Always Black and White, We Provide Clarity When It's Complex
Berly Rouse | Attorneys at Law
311 Johnnie Dodds Blvd, Ste. 171
Mount Pleasant, SC 29464
© 2025 Berly Rouse Attorneys at Law. All Rights Reserved.
